Reading Time: 10 min.
Almost every technical drawing for mechanical components contains the notation "ISO 2768-mK" or "General tolerance DIN ISO 2768-m" somewhere in the title block. For procurement professionals sourcing parts internationally, this is more than a reference code. It determines the dimensional deviations a manufacturer must hold — and ultimately, whether the part fits or doesn't.
In brief: ISO 2768 defines general tolerances for all dimensions not individually toleranced on a drawing. Part 1 establishes four classes for linear and angular dimensions (f, m, c, v), Part 2 three classes for form and position (H, K, L). The most common designation in mechanical engineering is ISO 2768-mK — medium accuracy for both dimensions and geometry. The standard is currently under revision — the FDIS draft has been in ballot since April 2026, with publication expected late 2026.
ISO 2768 ranks among the most widely applied standards in mechanical engineering. Published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), it governs the permissible deviations for all dimensions on a drawing that carry no individual tolerance. Without it, every single dimension would need its own tolerance callout — an enormous effort for complex parts with 50 or more dimensions.
In international procurement, ISO 2768 serves as a silent quality anchor. Many rejections don't stem from poor manufacturing. They arise because buyer and supplier hold different assumptions about allowable deviations. The standard creates a shared language.
The standard is divided into two parts:
ISO 2768-1: General tolerances for linear and angular dimensions
ISO 2768-2: General tolerances for form and position (geometrical tolerances)
In Germany, the standard is published as DIN ISO 2768. It replaced the older DIN 7168, which still appears on legacy drawings. Those looking for more background on quality control in product development will find complementary fundamentals there.
Part 1 of the standard establishes four tolerance classes with different levels of manufacturing precision. Class "m" (medium) is the most prevalent — it appears on the majority of mechanical engineering drawings. Choosing the right class affects both cost and functional reliability of a component.
Class | Designation | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|
f | fine | Precision parts, fits, fine mechanics |
m | medium | Standard machine parts, most common class |
c | coarse | Welded structures, castings |
v | very coarse | Rough sheet metal parts, non-functional dimensions |
Why does class selection matter so much? A class that's too tight — say "f" instead of "m" — drives up manufacturing cost without functional necessity. A class that's too wide — "c" instead of "m" — can cause assembly and fit issues. The trade-off between cost and quality is decided right here.
The permissible limit deviations depend on the nominal dimension range. The table below shows values for all four tolerance classes in millimetres — this is the central reference for anyone working with ISO 2768.
Nominal dimension range (mm) | f (fine) | m (medium) | c (coarse) | v (very coarse) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 to 3 | ± 0.05 | ± 0.1 | ± 0.2 | — |
over 3 to 6 | ± 0.05 | ± 0.1 | ± 0.3 | ± 0.5 |
over 6 to 30 | ± 0.1 | ± 0.2 | ± 0.5 | ± 1.0 |
over 30 to 120 | ± 0.15 | ± 0.3 | ± 0.8 | ± 1.5 |
over 120 to 400 | ± 0.2 | ± 0.5 | ± 1.2 | ± 2.5 |
over 400 to 1000 | ± 0.3 | ± 0.8 | ± 2.0 | ± 4.0 |
over 1000 to 2000 |

