A quote lists USD 850 in freight costs, yet the final invoice after the shipment lands several hundred dollars higher, even though nothing about the route itself changed. Surcharges like the bunker adjustment and terminal handling almost always explain that gap, but rarely appear as separate line items in the original quote.
In brief: Freight costs consist of the base freight plus several surcharges, such as the Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) for fuel costs and the Terminal Handling Charge (THC) for port handling. The basis for calculation isn't always the actual weight, either, but the so-called chargeable weight: whichever is greater, actual weight or volumetric weight.
Freight costs consist of the base freight, the pure transport service from point A to point B, plus a range of surcharges that vary by transport mode and route. In everyday use, this also gets called transport cost calculation or forwarding cost calculation, and a simple freight cost calculator usually only reflects the base freight while leaving the surcharges out. That holds for ocean freight from China to Germany too, where base freight and surcharges can swing considerably depending on the route and carrier. Anyone who compares only the base freight usually underestimates the actual cost by a wide margin.
For buyers, this breakdown matters because the individual components move differently over time: while base freight is usually negotiable through tenders, many surcharges track external indices like the oil price and can barely be influenced. A quote that only states the base freight often looks cheaper at first glance than it actually turns out to be.
Freight costs aren't always calculated on a shipment's actual weight; they're calculated on what's known as chargeable weight instead. Chargeable weight is always whichever is greater: actual weight or volumetric weight, since light but bulky shipments would otherwise take up disproportionate transport space without that being reflected in the price.
In our sourcing projects, the difference between the divisors keeps causing confusion. Air cargo freight generally uses the IATA-recommended divisor of 6,000, while courier and express parcel services typically calculate with a divisor of 5,000 instead. The two figures get mixed up often in practice, which quickly leads to the wrong cost expectations.
Transport Mode | Divisor | Volumetric Weight at 1 m³ |
|---|---|---|
Air cargo freight (IATA standard) | 6,000 | ≈ 167 kg |
Courier/express parcel services | 5,000 | ≈ 200 kg |
Sea freight (LCL) | 1,000 | 1,000 kg |
A quick example makes the difference concrete: a carton measuring 80 × 60 × 50 cm has a volume of 0.24 m³. At an actual weight of 25 kg, the volumetric weight for air freight works out to (80 × 60 × 50) ÷ 6,000 = 40 kg. Since 40 kg is higher than the actual weight, the shipment gets billed on the chargeable weight of 40 kg, not the actual 25 kg.
Alongside the base freight, freight costs usually include several surcharges that supplement the actual transport service. The Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) offsets a carrier's fluctuating fuel costs and is one of the core cost components of an ocean freight shipment. The Terminal Handling Charge (THC) covers container handling at the port and applies at both the origin and destination port.
Other possible surcharges include the Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF) for exchange rate fluctuations, a congestion surcharge during port congestion, and seasonal surcharges during periods of high demand, for instance ahead of Chinese New Year. Which of these actually apply depends heavily on the route and transport mode. A single quote can't simply be carried over to a different lane.
Surcharge | Meaning |
|---|---|
BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor) | Offsets fluctuating fuel costs |
THC (Terminal Handling Charge) | Covers container handling at the port |
CAF (Currency Adjustment Factor) | Offsets exchange rate fluctuations |
Congestion Surcharge | Applied during port congestion or capacity shortages |
Which party bears which part of the cost is set by the agreed Incoterm, the contractually agreed delivery term, not by the freight costs themselves. Under EXW, the buyer bears practically the entire freight chain; under DDP, the seller covers it in full, including customs.
Anyone comparing these figures between two quotes should therefore always check first whether both quotes are based on the same Incoterm. Otherwise it's easy to compare apples to oranges, for instance an FOB freight quote without the main carriage against a DDP quote that already includes every surcharge.
Incoterm | Who Bears the Freight Costs? |
|---|---|
EXW | Buyer bears the entire freight chain from the seller's works |
FOB | Seller up to loading at the port of origin, buyer from there |
CIF | Seller up to the destination port, including sea freight and insurance |
DDP | Seller bears the entire freight chain, including customs |
When determining customs value under the CIF method, freight costs up to the destination point count directly toward the assessment basis for import duty and import VAT. Freight that's incompletely disclosed can therefore lead not just to additional charges from the forwarder, but also to an incorrect customs declaration. That holds even when the freight is listed separately on the commercial invoice. Customs value counts the actual freight to the destination point regardless of how it's broken out on the invoice.
In our sourcing projects, we always have freight costs presented fully broken down, including every surcharge, before a shipment gets customs-cleared. That saves after-the-fact disputes with customs over which cost components should actually have counted toward the customs value.
Yes, substantially: with full container load (FCL), you pay a flat rate for the entire container regardless of how full it actually is, while with LCL you pay proportionally by volume or chargeable weight. For smaller shipments, LCL is usually cheaper; past a certain fill level, the math tips in favor of FCL.
That tipping point isn't a fixed percentage of container capacity; it depends on the current rate environment instead. At low ocean freight rates, FCL often pays off at a lower fill level; at high rates, that threshold shifts upward. Anyone who regularly ships similar volumes should recalculate both options periodically rather than settling on a rule of thumb once and leaving it there.
Shipping cost is just one of several components in a procurement's total cost of ownership. Anyone who compares only the raw purchase price between suppliers, without factoring in the actual freight costs and surcharges, is choosing a supplier on an incomplete basis.
That matters especially when comparing several Far East suppliers with similar purchase prices but different geographic locations: a supplier that looks cheaper on paper can end up more expensive overall due to longer inland legs to the port or less favorable consolidation routes. Only once purchase price, freight costs, and customs costs are considered together can you identify the option that's actually the most economical.
Freight costs result from the base freight plus surcharges like BAF and THC, calculated on the chargeable weight, meaning whichever is greater between actual and volumetric weight. There's no blanket formula for the final price, since surcharges fluctuate.
Freight costs include the base freight plus all surcharges such as the bunker surcharge, terminal handling charge, and, where applicable, the currency adjustment factor or congestion surcharge. Separate items like customs duty or import VAT usually don't count toward it.
Freight costs fluctuate mainly because many surcharges are tied to external indices like the oil price or available transport capacity. Seasonal demand spikes, for instance ahead of Chinese New Year, amplify these fluctuations further.
That depends on the shipment's fill level: for smaller partial loads, LCL is usually cheaper, since you only pay for the portion actually used. Past a certain shipment size, FCL's flat rate becomes more economical.
Anyone who compares only the base freight almost always underestimates the actual freight cost. Only the combination of chargeable weight, every surcharge, and the agreed Incoterm gives you the complete picture needed to compare quotes fairly. Naming these components clearly already at the inquiry stage, rather than discovering them on the final invoice, puts you in a considerably stronger negotiating position.
Line Up supports you in calculating and verifying your freight costs from Far East sourcing. 👉 Schedule a no-obligation consultation.
Your requirements are unique. So are our solutions. Let's talk about it.
Schedule a call →Sign up now for our free Line Up newsletter and stay up to date.

